Medical Review & Fact-Check Policy

Our Commitment to Accuracy and Reliability

At Mumin Med, we understand that healthcare professionals rely on accurate, evidence-based information to support their practice, wellness, and career decisions. This Medical Review & Fact-Check Policy outlines our rigorous processes for ensuring that every piece of content we publish meets the highest standards of accuracy and reliability.

Last Updated: January 6, 2026

Why Medical Accuracy Matters

As a platform created by nurses for nurses, we recognize that:

Lives depend on accurate information: Healthcare professionals use our content to inform their practice and personal health decisions
Trust is paramount: Our community trusts us to provide reliable, evidence-based information
Misinformation has consequences: Inaccurate health information can lead to harm
Professional standards matter: We uphold the same standards of accuracy expected in clinical practice

Our Multi-Layer Review Process

Stage 1: Content Creation

Primary Author Review:

Abdul-Muumin Wedraogo, BSN, RN (Founder & Editor-in-Chief):

10+ years clinical nursing experience (ER, Pediatrics, ICU, General Ward)
Bachelor of Science in Nursing, Valley View University, Ghana
Active registration: Nurses and Midwifery Council (NMC), Ghana
Member: Ghana Registered Nurses and Midwives Association (GRNMA)

Content Development Standards:

Research begins with peer-reviewed sources and authoritative medical databases
Multiple sources consulted for each medical claim
Current evidence prioritized (publications within the last 5 years preferred)
Clinical experience balanced with evidence-based research
Preliminary fact-checking during the writing process

Stage 2: Source Verification

Primary Sources We Prioritize:

Tier 1 – Highest Authority:

Peer-reviewed medical and nursing journals
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Clinical practice guidelines from professional organizations
Government health agencies (WHO, CDC, NIH, FDA)
National and international nursing organizations

Tier 2 – Credible Secondary Sources:

Reputable medical institutions and hospitals
Academic medical centers and universities
Established health information websites (.gov, .edu, major medical institutions)
Professional healthcare associations
Evidence-based clinical resources (UpToDate, Cochrane Library)

Sources We Avoid:

Unverified social media claims
Commercial websites without cited sources
Opinion pieces without evidence
Outdated research (generally >10 years, unless historical context)
Sources with clear conflicts of interest or bias

Stage 3: Fact-Checking Protocol

Every Medical Claim Must Be:

Verifiable: Traceable to a credible, authoritative source
Current: Based on the most recent evidence available
Contextual: Presented with appropriate qualifications and limitations
Accurate: Faithfully representing the source material
Relevant: Applicable to the nursing and healthcare context

Fact-Checking Checklist:

✓ Statistical Claims: All numbers, percentages, and statistics verified against sources
✓ Medical Terminology: Proper usage confirmed through medical dictionaries and authoritative resources
✓ Treatment Information: Cross-referenced with current clinical guidelines
✓ Drug Information: Verified against pharmaceutical databases and FDA resources
✓ Symptom Descriptions: Confirmed through medical literature
✓ Healthcare Procedures: Validated against current best practices and protocols
✓ Historical Information: Verified through multiple reputable sources
✓ Professional Guidelines: Confirmed with relevant nursing and medical organizations

Stage 4: Citation and Attribution

Our Citation Standards:

Direct Attribution: All factual claims linked to their sources
Transparency: Clear distinction between evidence-based information and professional opinion
Accessibility: Links provided to accessible sources when possible
Primary Sources Preferred: Original research cited over secondary reporting
Date Verification: Publication dates included to establish currency

Citation Format:

In-text hyperlinks to credible sources
Reference lists for research-heavy articles
“According to [Source]” attribution for key claims
Clear labeling when content is based on clinical experience vs. research

Stage 5: Medical Review

Healthcare Professional Review:

Content undergoes review by qualified healthcare professionals when:

Discussing complex medical conditions
Addressing treatment or medication information
Covering specialized clinical topics
Making health recommendations
Discussing potentially controversial medical topics

Review Criteria:

Medical accuracy and completeness
Appropriate scope and limitations
Clear, understandable language
Proper medical terminology usage
Appropriate warnings and disclaimers

Stage 6: Editorial Review

Final Editorial Check:

Before publication, all content is reviewed for:

Clarity: Information presented in accessible, understandable language
Completeness: All necessary context and qualifications included
Balance: Multiple perspectives represented when appropriate
Safety: Proper warnings and disclaimers included
Consistency: Alignment with our editorial standards and previous content

Content-Specific Review Standards

Clinical/Medical Content

Topics Requiring Enhanced Review:

Disease conditions and pathophysiology
Medication information
Treatment protocols
Diagnostic procedures
Clinical assessments
Patient safety issues

Additional Verification:

Minimum of 3 authoritative sources required
Cross-referenced with current clinical guidelines
Reviewed for alignment with evidence-based practice
Clear distinction between standard care and emerging practices

Mental Health Content

Special Considerations:

Evidence-based approaches to mental wellness
Crisis resources and hotlines included
Clear statements about professional support
Stigma-reducing language
Sensitivity to vulnerable readers

Required Elements:

Encouragement to seek professional help
Crisis hotline information when discussing serious conditions
Disclaimers about content not replacing therapy

Wellness and Self-Care Content

Verification Standards:

Recommendations based on evidence, when possible
Clear labeling of evidence-based vs. anecdotal advice
Safety considerations addressed
Appropriate medical disclaimers
Contraindications noted when relevant

Career and Professional Development Content

Review Focus:

Accuracy of professional requirements and regulations
Currency of career information
Alignment with professional nursing standards
Verification of educational and certification information
Accuracy of workplace regulations and policies

Ongoing Content Monitoring

Regular Review Schedule

Quarterly Reviews:

High-traffic medical content is reviewed every 3 months
Updated with new research or guideline changes
Links checked for accuracy and accessibility

Annual Reviews:

All medical and clinical content is reviewed annually
Sources verified for currency
Content updated or archived as needed

Continuous Monitoring:

Medical news monitored for relevant updates
Reader feedback reviewed for accuracy concerns
Professional literature was scanned for new evidence

Update Protocol

When Content Requires Updates:

Minor Updates (no significant change in medical consensus):

Content updated silently
“Last updated” date modified
No reader notification required

Significant Updates (new evidence or changed recommendations):

Content revised with editor’s note
Update notice at the top of the article
Original publication and update dates are both shown
Explanation of what changed and why

Major Corrections (error in original content):

A prominent correction notice was published
Detailed explanation of the error and correction
Apology and commitment to accuracy reiterated
Review of the editorial process to prevent future errors

Fact-Check Documentation

Internal Records

We maintain documentation of:

Sources consulted for each article
Date of fact-checking
Reviewer names and credentials
Updates and revisions made
Reader feedback and responses

Source Archive

Links to all cited sources archived
PDF copies of key sources are maintained
Documentation of source credentials and authority
Notes on any conflicting information found

Handling Conflicting Evidence

When Sources Disagree

Our Approach:

Present Multiple Perspectives: Acknowledge disagreement in medical literature
Evaluate Source Quality: Prioritize higher-quality evidence
Note Limitations: Clearly state when evidence is limited or conflicting
Avoid Overstatement: Use qualified language (“some evidence suggests,” “research indicates”)
Provide Context: Explain why disagreement exists when possible

Language We Use:

“Current evidence suggests…” (when consensus exists)
“Some research indicates…” (when evidence is preliminary)
“Experts disagree about…” (when no clear consensus)
“More research is needed…” (when evidence is limited)

Reader Reporting and Corrections

How to Report Inaccuracies

We Welcome Your Input:

If you identify an error, outdated information, or questionable claim, please contact us:

Email: [contact@muminmed.com]
Subject Line: “Content Accuracy Concern”

Please Include:

Article title and URL
Specific claim or information in question
Why do you believe it’s inaccurate
Corrected information and source (if available)
Your credentials (optional but helpful)

Our Response Commitment

Within 48 Hours:

Acknowledgment of your concern
Initial review of the issue
Temporary content warning if necessary

Within 7 Days:

Thorough investigation completed
Correction made or explanation provided
Response sent to reporter
Public correction if warranted

Transparency in Limitations

What We Acknowledge

Our Content Has Limitations:

Not Personalized Medical Advice: General information cannot replace individual assessment
Not Always Comprehensive: Articles provide an overview, not exhaustive coverage
Geographic Variations: Some information may be specific to certain regions or healthcare systems
Evolving Evidence: Medical knowledge changes; our content reflects current understanding
Professional Judgment Required: Clinical decisions require individual assessment and expertise

We Clearly State:

When evidence is limited or preliminary
When recommendations are based on professional experience vs. research
When topics are controversial or debated
When information applies to specific populations
When readers should consult healthcare providers

Special Categories Requiring Extra Care

Emergency Medical Information

Enhanced Review For:

Life-threatening conditions
Emergency symptoms
Time-sensitive medical situations

Required Elements:

Prominent “seek immediate medical attention” warnings
Clear description of emergency symptoms
Emergency contact information (911, local emergency numbers)
No delay in seeking care encouraged

Medication Information

Verification Requirements:

Cross-referenced with pharmaceutical databases
Current FDA or equivalent agency information
Side effects and contraindications included
Clear statements about prescriber consultation
No specific dosing recommendations (requires physician)

Pediatric and Pregnancy-Related Content

Additional Safeguards:

Age-specific information is clearly labeled
Safety warnings for vulnerable populations
Encouragement to consult a pediatrician or OB-GYN
Recognition of special considerations for these populations

Mental Health and Crisis Content

Required Components:

Crisis hotline numbers are prominently displayed
Encouragement to seek professional help
Non-stigmatizing language
Acknowledgment of severity when appropriate
Resources for immediate support

Quality Assurance Metrics

How We Measure Success

Accuracy Indicators:

Number of corrections required
Reader-reported inaccuracies
Time between publication and necessary updates
Source quality ratings
Citation completeness

Continuous Improvement:

Regular review of correction patterns
Analysis of common accuracy issues
Process refinement based on findings
Additional training in the identified weak areas
Reader feedback integration

Professional Accountability

Our Standards Mirror Clinical Practice

Just as nurses are held to standards of:

Evidence-based practice
Continuing education
Professional accountability
Patient safety
Ethical conduct

We Hold Our Content to Standards of:

Evidence-based information
Continuous learning and updating
Editorial accountability
Reader safety
Ethical journalism

Professional Affiliations

Our commitment to accuracy is supported by membership and alignment with:

Nurses and Midwifery Council (NMC), Ghana
Ghana Registered Nurses and Midwives Association (GRNMA)
Evidence-based practice principles
Nursing code of ethics
Health information quality standards

Technology and Tools

Fact-Checking Resources We Use

Medical Databases:

PubMed/MEDLINE
Cochrane Library
CINAHL (Nursing & Allied Health)
UpToDate
Clinical practice guideline databases

Verification Tools:

Medical terminology databases
Drug reference databases
Link checkers for source verification
Plagiarism detection (ensuring original content)
Date verification for the source currency

Professional Resources:

Nursing organization guidelines
Government health agency publications
Professional medical association statements
Regulatory body communications

Training and Expertise

Maintaining Reviewer Competency

Ongoing Professional Development:

Regular review of evidence-based practice principles
Continuing education in clinical specialties
Training in health literacy and communication
Updates on fact-checking best practices
Participation in professional nursing activities

Expertise Areas:

Clinical nursing practice (10+ years experience)
Evidence-based practice
Health information literacy
Medical research interpretation
Patient education and communication

Ethical Considerations

Beyond Accuracy: Responsible Health Information

We Consider:

Health Equity: Information accessible to diverse populations
Health Literacy: Content appropriate for various education levels
Cultural Sensitivity: Respect for diverse healthcare practices and beliefs
Harm Reduction: Prioritizing reader safety over engagement
Empowerment: Information that enables informed decisions

We Avoid:

Fear-mongering or sensationalism
Unsubstantiated health claims
Promotion of unproven treatments
Stigmatizing language
Information that could lead to self-harm or dangerous decisions

Conflict of Interest Management

Maintaining Independence

Financial Conflicts:

No payment from companies for content recommendations
Sponsored content is clearly labeled
Affiliate relationships disclosed
Editorial independence from advertisers

Professional Conflicts:

Personal opinions are distinguished from evidence
Acknowledgment when topics involve professional debate
Multiple perspectives are included when appropriate

External Review and Collaboration

When We Seek Additional Expertise

External Review Requested For:

Highly specialized clinical topics outside primary expertise
Controversial or debated medical topics
Complex statistical or research methodology questions
Topics requiring specialized credentials

Collaboration Partners:

Nursing educators and specialists
Practicing clinicians in relevant specialties
Research professionals
Public health experts
Patient advocacy organizations

Reader Trust and Transparency

Our Promise to You

We Commit To: ✓ Prioritizing accuracy over speed
✓ Admitting and correcting errors promptly
✓ Explaining our reasoning and limitations
✓ Continuous improvement of our processes
✓ Responding to reader concerns seriously
✓ Maintaining professional integrity
✓ Putting reader safety first always

You Can Expect:

Honest acknowledgment of uncertainty
Clear distinction between fact and opinion
Transparent sourcing and citations
Prompt corrections when needed
Accessible, evidence-based information
Respect for your intelligence and professionalism

Contact Our Fact-Check Team

Questions About Our Process:
[contact@muminmed.com]

Report an Accuracy Concern:
[contact@muminmed.com]

Suggest a Content Update:
[contact@muminmed.com]

General Editorial Inquiries:
[contact@muminmed.com]

Final Statement

Medical accuracy is not just a policy at Mumin Med – it’s a professional obligation and moral imperative. As healthcare professionals, we understand the weight of responsibility that comes with providing health information. Every fact we check, every source we verify, and every correction we make honors that responsibility.

Your trust in our content is our most valuable asset. We work diligently every day to earn and maintain it.

Abdul-Muumin Wedraogo, BSN, RN
Founder & Editor-in-Chief
Mumin Med

This Medical Review & Fact-Check Policy is a living document. We update it regularly to reflect evolving best practices in health information and medical journalism. Last reviewed: January 6, 2026